However, it would have been naïve to assume that with the end of the open conflicts, war architecture would disappear. The contributions in the current Balkan.Perspectives edition provide a collection of analysis on how these traumas are still shaping memorialization in public spaces, and entire silhouettes of our cities in the Western Balkans. Thus, we seek to draw attention to the importance of engaging in active discussions on dealing with the past and commemoration in public space. We emphasize the long-term historical contexts of conflicts and trauma in the region and how these traumas construct ideas of living together, memorialization practices in public spaces, and spatial policies.

The Balkan.Perspectives editorial team strongly believes that the discussion about conflicts needs more than one perspective, because history must always have at least two faces and include multi-perspective approaches. If it has only one side, then there is something wrong: either with the history or the truth. In this Balkan.Perspectives edition we want to add another witness to the discussion about dealing with the past: a critical reflection on how trauma and violence are inscribed in (public) space creation, architecture, and spatial construction in the post-conflict societies of the Western Balkans, and how in this context they hinder an open, evidence-based, and multi-perspective approach to the past of the region.

The contributions for Balkan.Perspectives #17 include the ones Arbër Sadiki on the socio-political factors shaping the silhouette of Kosovo’s cities after the war of 1998/1999. Ares Shporta from the Lumbardhi Foundation in Prizren takes us on a journey through the cinematographic history of Kosovo and its importance for grassroots movements reclaiming space and raises the importance of connecting these movements with topics of dealing with the past. Filip Koneski’s contribution in two parts reflect on urban history, the present and future of Skopje. Ena Kukić elaborates on the various memory layers of the Vraca Memory Complex in Sarajevo, while Nermina Trbonja reflects on the mass erection of nationalistic and revisionist monuments in Bosnia and Hercegovina. Irina Subotić writes on the urban development plan and status quo of Belgrade and how this related to the current political situation in Serbia. Dr. Olga Manojlović Pintar confronts us with the “Four Theses on the Architecture of Trauma” in the Serbian and regional context.

The Balkan.Perspectives editorial team highly appreciated the positive and constructive feedback on our first Balkan.Perspectives Podcast episode and we are happy to present in this Balkan.Perspectives edition complementary perspectives and opinions around dealing with the past, architecture, and public space. Please visit the website www.dwp-balkan.org for further information and to listen to the current podcasts. We would like to thank all our partners, the production team behind and in front of the microphones and our guests of the podcasts. In Bosnia and Hercegovina, we thank the media platform Naratorium, Đorđe Krajišnik and Armina Pilav, Damir Ugljen team from Un-war space project  and Nedžad Novalić from Centre for nonviolent action. In Kosovo we thank the TILLT Radio team, Bekim Ramku from the Kosovo Architecture Festival and Serbeze Haxhiaj. In North Macedonia we thank Radio MOF and Filip Koneski. In Serbia we thank the radio show Ženergija on Radio Aparat and its author Zoe Gudović and Iva Čukić, Senka Domanović, and Olja Nikolić Kia.
In the name of the Balkan.Perspectives editorial team I wish you an interesting read and enjoyable listening.
Alexander Vojvoda
Editor in Chief